Not too long ago I was interviewing the Zambian artist William Miko for a piece I was writing.  He told how he believed art to be the key to the development of a country.  He sited Japan's long history of creativity and compared it with their technological achievements.

 

What do you think? Does art contribute to development in terms of ideas, cultural reactions, how we see the world etc.?

Tags: art, culture, development

Views: 21

Reply to This

Replies to This Post

I often wonder how much the creative and futuristic part of the movie industry shapes our world as technology allows a believable paradox to what is real. I found I was becoming evermore disillusioned so I turned off most media 5 years ago to peruse my own thoughts without manipulation and enjoy understanding events through conversation and articulation of others character. As a child I grew up feeling it was important to assimilate as much information as possible to demonstrate intelligence, I'm now inclined to understand that my ability to capture important events as art, demonstrates reasoning and conviction and being intelligent requires reliability of known facts. So, will any amount of known facts put a country further ahead, I think not,' its not what you say but the you say it' wins my vote.
What others will see in me is perhaps an assumption that I am an anomaly to be grouped as 'out there' so I am fortunate to be in a less critical country of artistic merit with a tolerance for imperfect results as I mature..
I believe that artists should take a strong priority in the development of a country or culture. The reason for this is that most artists use their imaginations without many of the same boundaries as rigid scholars in their thinking and can come up with more creative solutions to civil, social, and legal problems. Of course there has to be a balance between art and reality, but it is the freedom of thought of the artist mind that can solve many problems that conventional wisdom cannot. The famous artist, entrepreneur, businessman, and producer; Walt Disney understood this principle and coined the word, imagineering.
I think you're absolutely right! Look at Da Vinci!
Are there other examples of artists out there of artists that became successful political leaders (and maybe then when back to the arts?). I can think of a dictator that wanted to be an artist and ended up a monster. But are there other examples in history of artists who became political leaders and lead people successfully through tough times (e.g. economically, oppression)? I'm not just talking about on the macro government level, but am also curious about artists who became leaders in local government. Can anyone think of any?

What a fascinating discussion! But I'm sure you've all got much more to say about this fascinating topic.I hope you don't mind me starting it up again as I'd love to hear more. I'm so convinced that art is the key to development that I've set a little company up to find out more!  I'm from the UK where art is very much considered a luxury for the privileged few and not, as I believe it should be, the birthright of each and everyone of us. Aren't the arts and creativity essential to the development of us all as individuals, groups and communities?

Do let me know what you think and, if you do think art has this power, what do you think we should do about it?

I look forward to hearing from you,

Dave

RSS

Stay In Touch

Follow Create Culture
Visit Us On FacebookFollow Us On TwitterVisit Us On YouTubeRSS Feed

Receive Our Newsletter

© 2013   Created by Create Culture.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

<